Try to explain this shit

[Whiplash]

I really can't
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5W5BXIhvlQ

[Pingu]

It must be 2 people ofcourse. Two small ones. The upper one could be someone who lost his legs during war maybe. And in the legs is just another small human. Both combined in a suit. Also the camera work is a bit weird some parts they skip a bit. Like putting the human back together.

Also, why is the box there? The lower dude probably has his body in the box bending over. This is why the camera probably skips later and they dont show that they are moving the legs.

[Whiplash]

It must be 2 people ofcourse. Two small ones. The upper one could be someone who lost his legs during war maybe. And in the legs is just another small human. Both combined in a suit. Also the camera work is a bit weird some parts they skip a bit. Like putting the human back together.

Also, why is the box there? The lower dude probably has his body in the box bending over. This is why the camera probably skips later and they dont show that they are moving the legs.

Hmm, theory of two little men maybe can't work. His torso is normal (look how big are his arms). Also, look how natural is his moving after the whole show. It's really hard to believe there are 2 "pieces" like two guys.
Maybe you can't complain about the camera too, because it's reality show. I guess they all saw it correctly.
But, like you said, upper one is probably guy without the legs. It's just hard to believe that he can make such a natural moves after the whole show.

[Pingu]

Practice practice practice Ever watched those talent shows, you see the sickest things. I still think it's this way.. because otherwise it isn't really possible

[Whiplash]

And look these legs; how tall they are. There can't be a little man. Anyway, good try.
Maybe it's just a magic.

[Jurgen-NL]

Robot legs with someone missing limbs below look at how big those feet get cut off if a real person was sliced there more blood would show and scatter off.
A substance of soft material which is easy to stick togheter on the guy with missing limbs and the legs.
And a then a what Pingu said practise practise practise and you can make money out of being succesfull.

[Pingu]

Yeah the face is also very clearly of a doll.. no expressions and why the big glasses

[Whiplash]

Robot legs

Technology can't be that good man. If could, I would cut my legs right now.

Yeah the face is also very clearly of a doll.. no expressions and why the big glasses

They just wanted that you think that something is wrong about it.

[Whiplash]

My explanation:
There are two guys: one without the legs, and one without the torso and head.

[Pingu]

My explanation:
There are two guys: one without the legs, and one without the torso and head.

So that's solved

[Whiplash]

My explanation:
There are two guys: one without the legs, and one without the torso and head.

So that's solved

Yeah. Damn, how I couldn't get that idea before?

[Dide Dide]

http://www.anirudhsethireport.com/wp-co ... 00x500.jpg

Can someone try to explain this

[Whiplash]

http://www.anirudhsethireport.com/wp-co ... 00x500.jpg

Can someone try to explain this

hahahahahah

[Dide Dide]

http://www.anirudhsethireport.com/wp-co ... 00x500.jpg

Can someone try to explain this

IQ theory views the racial disparity in crime rates as a result of IQ difference between races. In his book The g Factor (1998), Arthur Jensen cites data which shows that, regardless of race, people with IQs between 70 and 90 have higher crime rates than people with IQs below or above this range, with the peak range being between 80 and 90. Jensen and others have claimed that the average IQ of African Americans is 85, to be compared with 100 for White Americans and 106 for Asian Americans. According to Jensen, when crime rates are compared between races while adjusting for IQ, they are approximately the same. Thus, Jensen proposes, the disparity in crime rates between races can be explained by the proportions of each group with IQs in the range at greatest risk for antisocial behavior.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_c ... #IQ_theory

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigrant_criminality

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/ad ... t93-01.pdf

Wow !

[Whiplash]

Ok, now I have the hardest one. Try to explain this shit:
http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php ... 9&comments

Some guy explained it by his comment like this:
"That's because they are black"
Do not take this like a racism. That's just a joke. Maybe someone can find better explanation?

[misterpom]

Del shows a study by a racist guy to prove that white people commit less crimes than black people or are less inclined to commit violence because they're smarter, when everyone knows IQ is not an accurate measure of intelligence and that races have no influence whatsoever in a person's intelligence. Other variables like the mother's education level, the economic conditions of the household, the place where you were born and even ideology play a bigger role.

It's strange because some of the most psychopatic people ever were white (Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin) and asian (Mao Tse Tung, Pol Pot). The people who have causes more destruction in the history of the world are the white europeans. Have you forgot who caused both world wars? Should we presume europeans are a bunch of stupid idiots with low IQ because of all the violence they have caused? I guess not. Anyway, junk science by Del right there.

Then I remembered how Del promptly acted to protect Pingu from my accusations of racism. I guess it all makes sense now. It's a shame some people in Turbosliders support that kind of racist idiocy here disguised as science.

[Whiplash]

Del shows a study by a racist guy to prove that white people commit less crimes than black people or are less inclined to commit violence because they're smarter, when everyone knows IQ is not an accurate measure of intelligence and that races have no influence whatsoever in a person's intelligence. Other variables like the mother's education level, the economic conditions of the household, the place where you were born and even ideology play a bigger role.

Yep. And many of those conditions (like low education level, bad economic situation) are affected by white people. History just played a lot with black people. The same thing happened to Jews and many others.

It's a shame Turbosliders supports that kind of racist idiocy here disguised as science.

Correct. Well, dede can (should) delete it easily.

[misterpom]

I already asked for his ban.

viewtopic.php?t=1903

I don't think the community should support this kind of behavior from racist people. Any racist behavior I see, I'm sure to report to the moderators. Then the moderators decide what to do. I'm certainly not going to be quiet about it, even if people might think I'm exagerating.

[misterpom]

Peace-loving peoples in Africa as we see... Then there's the fact that in recent times Africans have not really had enough power to cause huge destruction. Let's see how many African countries have nuclear weapons for example. Oh. You've probably read about Poland's role in WWII. There's a reason they didn't attack Germany in 1939. And that's exactly why African countries didn't attack Europe in 1939. And as you seem to think all dictators are psychopatic (which I would not necessarily agree with), Africa's had (and still has (and they aren't too common elsewhere nowadays)) its fair share too.

Wars are mostly pretty stupid. But if you really really want to go there, shouldn't Poland (or actually the other powerful European nations) have given in to Germany so WWII wouldn't have been fought? Chances are the world would be a better place had Germany conquered all of Europe peacefully (or even through war).

Wikipedia is not the best of sources but the FBI doc should be pretty reliable... If you meant something other by "junk science" maybe you could refer me to it since I can't seem to find anything else that I have posted.

Who told you africans are peace loving? You're the one who is basing people's actions on the color of their skin, not me. Africans can be as violent as whites can given the chance. That's exactly the point I'm making and that's the point you're NOT. You're saying blacks tend to be more violent because they're supposedly more stupid. Even if that was true (obviously not), intelligent people do not always choose the peaceful way. Some geniuses are pretty evil people. It's not about intellect, it's about moral. The entire humanity has flaws. Also, looking at things only based on race is as stupid as can be and that's not scientific. You're ignoring many variables that you can't call it anything but junk science. It might feed your racist opinion, but it does nothing to the other people, the normal ones who actually don't give a shit about people's race when judging their character.

Yes, I guess the world should have surrendered to Hitler. That would make the world peaceful. We would have many Auschwitz around the world. Many peaceful people working for Hitler under the sign "Arbeit macht frei". Yes, you are really an idiot. You're sick and demented. Anyone who thinks that Hitler being successful would be a good think should have his balls ripped off. You're not worthy of carrying balls, as you're not a man.

Dictators are not psychotic. I guess not. Egotist people that do evil with a lot of power in hands and that only care about being worshipped and getting more power, even if it means killing people in death camps. That's the picture of a pretty reasonable individual right there.

Your "source" is biased and outdated. Nobody today believes this kind of shit anymore, only nazi apologists and revisionists.

Even if you were right and black people were inferior to white people, that still would make it wrong to call them "lazy" and "niggers". Just who the f*** you think you are, kid? Do you think you are better than black people because you born in a white country with a golden spoon in your mouth? If there is any proof that whites can be really stupid, you could be shown as an example. Don't think you're better than anyone because you're white or europen or whatever the class you think you belong to. You're just an idiot, individually.

[dede]

Maybe someone can find better explanation?

Maybe it's a precision work? They can't use the "force" because it would break something which is under the sand.

Or again, the digger is broken.

Or it's just a joke so that they could've made a funny video (probably this is the real reason).

[misterpom]

I'll try to answer in a sensible and non-racist way so as not to offend anyone.

I only posted those links to remind you to remind that it's not only Europeans who have fought wars (and still do). I never said only stupid people fight (initiate) wars. I just think peace would in most cases be the better choice.

Of course it ignores variables but when you're looking at the population of the US and the quite significant black minority you have a statistically significant sample size. It's not even science, just a historical statistic. And I'd like you to show me an adult who doesn't have prejudices about races...

I do agree with Hitler's politics beyond the headline-grabbing racial stuff too and I believe dictatorship is the best possible form of government. Finding the ideal ruler is obviously impossible. In the ideal dictatorship there is an individual with expert assistants who will make the decisions they want. In Al Gore's dictatorship you would have to power your house using windmills on your own property, in my dictatorship all those who believe in global warming would be shot, etc...

I'd like to know what "my source" is.

Why would it be wrong to call them niggers? Anyway, you're welcome to visit the suburs of European cities with 50+% immigrant families. They don't seem like nice places to me. Here where I live (probably less than 5% black), of the not-retirement-age adults on the streets during daytime when most people work a significantly higher proportion is black than 4-5 PM when people come from work.

I don't be to me reminded that. I never asserted that europeans are the only ones who create wars. Don't try to reverse it. I meant that europeans have caused the most destruction in the world. Cases in point: nazism, communism, world wars. Also, they have caused the most good: democracy, republicanism, human rights, etc. It's not because they're white or europeans. There are many many variables that influence that. Saying it's mostly about IQ and race it's simply scientific garbage, not to say morally wrong. You said about black people not having nuclear weapons. Well, the USA had and they used. I'm not judging if it was right or wrong, necessary or not. Still, they did.

You can have all the prejudices you want. The thing you can't do is, in a private community such as Turbosliders, with players from all parts of the world, come and say stupid shit like "niggers are all lazy" is offensive. This community is based on respect, like Dede stated many times.

I'm not going to get into the whole "perfect world". I don't like Al Gore and I don't believe in man made global warming. I think it's junk science. Still I don't think I'm entitled to shoot everyone who thinks differently. Your wish to have someone to use violence against some group you don't like just shows you're a coward. Do you believe it? Do it yourself then. Let's see how it works out for you.

I believe in republicanism and free market. That's all I have to say. It has its flaws but nationalism is stupid and it doesn't work. Anyone who thinks about people based on race and nationality is sick. I don't care. If you don't like your freedom and you want to be treated like a sheep by a semi-god dictator, that's your problem. Hitler was a sick man as was Stalin and any of their followers. That's just stating the obvious.

Your source is Arthur Jensen, the guy you mentioned. He's the one you shown to prove your stupid point.

There are way too many factors that determine blacks to do worse than whites. Whites being superior intellectually is certainly not one of them. If there is a problem in Europe with immigrants or minotiries, it certainly doesn't prove blacks are inferior. I'm not saying they're the victims of the system or anything like that. I'm just saying you can't say every member of certain group have the same characteristics. This is not scientific. It's just a stupid prejudice.

I'm just saying that all humans have its flaws. Pinpointing one group as a scapegoat of all problems makes no good. Actually, immigrants are the most hardworking people there are, because they have nothing to cling to but their work. There are always people who try to live off the system, but it only happens because the system gives them that incentive. They do the work some of you just won't do. Who do you think cleans the toilets? Blue eyed people? Think again.

Anyway. You might think whatever you want. Just try not saying offensive crap like niggers. That IS offensive.

I live in Brazil, man. Here we have many black people. Probably the biggest black population in the world. They're responsible for the most violence in my city. Still, I'm smart enough not to hate the decent blacks because of the criminal blacks. It's simply logical, since it's not fair. It's like hating all germans because of Hitler. It makes no sense.