Here you can post track-related information.
Moderator: Forum Moderators
-
Janne
- Community User Level: 3

- Posts: 406
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 6:40 pm
Post
by Janne » Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:50 am
How you can rotate walls and other "cannot rotate" stuff?
-
Hengari
- Community User Level: 3

- Posts: 462
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:14 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Hengari » Fri Aug 25, 2006 11:08 am
JTS wrote:How you can rotate walls and other "cannot rotate" stuff?
Oh man, people should learn to read

It stands clearly in my track design guide that you can rotate tiles when starting the editor with "-ar 1" parameter. After this you can rotate all tiles but not bridges diagonally (which is bad).
oldschool slider <3 | Hengari @ Quakenet/IRCnet
sliderpoint
-
Janne
- Community User Level: 3

- Posts: 406
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 6:40 pm
Post
by Janne » Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:21 pm
Thanks for info. I tried to search from here already.
-
-wolf-
- Community User Level: 4

- Posts: 614
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 10:07 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by -wolf- » Fri Aug 25, 2006 4:07 pm
hey cool! I didnt know about that! I also dont understand why ande made some tiles be un-rotated?

-
Hengari
- Community User Level: 3

- Posts: 462
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:14 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Hengari » Fri Aug 25, 2006 4:14 pm
Slider wrote:hey cool! I didnt know about that! I also dont understand why ande made some tiles be un-rotated?

Because the pre-calculated shadows. If you rotate the tiles the shadows are in wrong place if you're not careful about that.
oldschool slider <3 | Hengari @ Quakenet/IRCnet
sliderpoint
-
-wolf-
- Community User Level: 4

- Posts: 614
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 10:07 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by -wolf- » Fri Aug 25, 2006 6:42 pm
so if i use this short command everything about the shadows will be mesed up?

-
Hengari
- Community User Level: 3

- Posts: 462
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:14 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Hengari » Fri Aug 25, 2006 7:19 pm
Slider wrote:so if i use this short command everything about the shadows will be mesed up?

No, they will rotate with the tiles ofcourse but if you rotate them, they are not "right" (in wrong angle).
oldschool slider <3 | Hengari @ Quakenet/IRCnet
sliderpoint
-
Anddru
- Community User Level: 2

- Posts: 144
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:58 am
-
Contact:
Post
by Anddru » Sat Aug 26, 2006 10:00 am
When i rotate my iteams other than 0, 45, 90 and so on, i go to the .trk file and edit, but it takes very long time (and hard to make nice), is there any way to make it 'easy'?
-
Hengari
- Community User Level: 3

- Posts: 462
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:14 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Hengari » Sat Aug 26, 2006 10:11 am
Anddru wrote:When i rotate my iteams other than 0, 45, 90 and so on, i go to the .trk file and edit, but it takes very long time (and hard to make nice), is there any way to make it 'easy'?
When rotating tiles, just press shift +arrows for a little less rotation and ctrl+arrows for 1° rotation.
oldschool slider <3 | Hengari @ Quakenet/IRCnet
sliderpoint
-
Anddru
- Community User Level: 2

- Posts: 144
- Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:58 am
-
Contact:
Post
by Anddru » Sat Aug 26, 2006 3:31 pm
Hengari wrote:Anddru wrote:When i rotate my iteams other than 0, 45, 90 and so on, i go to the .trk file and edit, but it takes very long time (and hard to make nice), is there any way to make it 'easy'?
When rotating tiles, just press shift +arrows for a little less rotation and ctrl+arrows for 1° rotation.
THANKS

-
Jeffrey
- Community User Level: 3

- Posts: 432
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 12:57 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Jeffrey » Fri Sep 01, 2006 1:56 pm
I think its better to leave this thread just for new tracks
EDIT by Mouse - I have removed this as asked by Jeffrey. I have made an edit so those who responded to the post do not look like fools (responding to a post that is not there).
-
Tijny
- Community User Level: 5

- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 7:59 pm
Post
by Tijny » Fri Sep 01, 2006 2:09 pm
Jeffrey wrote:I think its better to leave this thread just for new tracks

How so, why not just in the "Post your tracks here" topic?
Edit: that track looks nice btw

-
Hengari
- Community User Level: 3

- Posts: 462
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:14 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Hengari » Fri Sep 01, 2006 2:17 pm
Tijny wrote:Jeffrey wrote:I think its better to leave this thread just for new tracks

Edit: that track looks nice btw

Track looks ok, but those diagonal start/finish lines are very bad. Never know which corner is the closest one.
oldschool slider <3 | Hengari @ Quakenet/IRCnet
sliderpoint
-
Guest
Post
by Guest » Fri Sep 01, 2006 3:21 pm
How do u get a Diaginal start it would be verry helpfull for me
-
-wolf-
- Community User Level: 4

- Posts: 614
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 10:07 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by -wolf- » Fri Sep 01, 2006 9:29 pm
Type startdirection <ur angle u need> in the trk file. right above checkpoints x line.
-
Mouse
- Community User Level: 5

- Posts: 1358
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 am
Post
by Mouse » Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:20 pm
hmmmm
If you type "startdirection" i do not think it will work. "StartDirection" is what must be typed. Some track-maker newbies would come to a problem if they did not know this.
-
Hengari
- Community User Level: 3

- Posts: 462
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 5:14 pm
-
Contact:
Post
by Hengari » Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:13 pm
Diagonal startdirection is bad. In tight race you might lose even if you come to the finish line first because actually the line is not there where you think it is.
oldschool slider <3 | Hengari @ Quakenet/IRCnet
sliderpoint
-
Mouse
- Community User Level: 5

- Posts: 1358
- Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 1:56 am
Post
by Mouse » Sat Sep 02, 2006 12:45 am
Hengari wrote:Diagonal startdirection is bad. In tight race you might lose even if you come to the finish line first because actually the line is not there where you think it is.
Good point. As you can see in this picture i made, if you drive on the top of the track you will finish faster that if you were to drive on the bottom. If 2 cars were side by side, the one on the top would finish first.

-
Augusto
- Community User Level: 1

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:44 pm
Post
by Augusto » Fri Jan 06, 2012 10:39 pm
Good point. As you can see in this picture i made, if you drive on the top of the track you will finish faster that if you were to drive on the bottom. If 2 cars were side by side, the one on the top would finish first.
is there any way to fix it?? can i place the starting line at 45 degrees??
-
shyguy1001
- Community User Level: 5

- Posts: 1111
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 5:35 pm
Post
by shyguy1001 » Fri Jan 06, 2012 11:10 pm
-wolf- wrote:Type startdirection <ur angle u need> in the trk file. right above checkpoints x line.

-
Whiplash
- Community User Level: 5

- Posts: 2325
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 4:57 pm
Post
by Whiplash » Sat Jan 07, 2012 10:03 am
Augusto wrote:
is there any way to fix it?? can i place the starting line at 45 degrees??
Sure, you have such track in "pu-tracks" folder. It's called Pu_Sahara. You will not see the 45 degree line in the editor, but it will work correct in the race.
-
Augusto
- Community User Level: 1

- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:44 pm
Post
by Augusto » Sat Jan 07, 2012 7:06 pm
Sure, you have such track in "pu-tracks" folder. It's called Pu_Sahara. You will not see the 45 degree line in the editor, but it will work correct in the race.
Thanks.. but it was easier and faster to rotate the track
