semir wrote:Last year point system was almost perfect, so I don't see a reason to change it. We had some points even for lower positions in rookie race (something like 0.95 for 2nd place, 0.90 for 3rd...), and we had seperatly something like rookie league with point system same as in pro league. That rookie league have even more sence now when there is this "8 of 10" thing up. So, my vote goes for last year point system.
That was far from perfect. The main problem there was that you don't know who's rookie and who is pro. If I drive only one rookie race, it will automatically treat me like a rookie racer too (even I also drove all pro races), which is senseless. I would be (for example) 10 in rookie league overall, and someone who played many rookie races will be better than me there. Why should somebody be treated like a rookie racer just because he drove one race there? Why would you be happy to beat someone in rookie league who played only one race there? Patetic.
Last year
Rookie overall : Sejtan 7., Pablinho 20.
All overall: Sejtan 37. and Pablinho even 5.
And of course, f*** the facts, Sejtan is better than Pablinho in rookie. huahuehaue
That's what I'm talking about. Rookie league stats am total no sense.
My suggestion is to set up points from 1. to 40. place.
40 (1 point), 39 (2 points) and so on. Sure point difference between first 5-10 places should be much bigger than 1 point.
Well, that could be unfair sometimes with different number of joined players. Maybe number of players should influence the number of points too.